-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Genbank Fixer Upper - Genbank Taxonomic Updater #145
Comments
Also suggested to republish genbank mammals with applied name changes. |
for the flat file publications - https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genbank/ |
@n8upham shared an appendix from published research[1] that describe ncbi records and suggested interpretations. UphamEtAl_MamPhy_IUCN-to-NCBI_matchup_Sept2015.csv First 10 lines -
references [1] Upham NS, Esselstyn JA, Jetz W (2019) Inferring the mammal tree: Species-level sets of phylogenies for questions in ecology, evolution, and conservation. PLoS Biol 17(12): e3000494. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000494 |
Related to NCBI Taxonomy / Accession - names in Genbank are sometimes outdates and may not "corrected" over time - Asellia tridens haplotype DF1 cytochrome b (cytb) gene, complete cds; mitochondrial - This accession is classified as Asellia tridens, but is used in the paper:
Benda,P., Vallo,P. and Reiter,A. 2011. Acta Chiropt. Taxonomic revision of the genus Asellia (Chiroptera:Hipposideridae) with a description of a new species from southern Arabia Acta Chiropt. 13 (2), 245-270 (2011)
describing the accession at Asellia arabica: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/JF439015 .
Prototype Idea: index genbank and make searchable annotations by individuals that make claims on how name associated to genbank accessions should be interpreted.
Initially at the level of Chiroptera
Could then do all mammals – and other taxa
Kendra claims that https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/JF439015 should be identified as Asellia arabica instead of Asellia tridens as documented in Benda,P., Vallo,P. and Reiter,A. 2011.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: