TASK: Switch ELN to DNF5 #201
Assignees
Labels
cleanup
Removal of deprecated or unwanted packages
Comments
yselkowitz
added
enhancement
yselkowitz
added
cleanup
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
yselkowitz
added a commit
to yselkowitz/content-resolver-input
that referenced
this issue
Nov 21, 2024
DNF5 will provide a dnf symlink, and DNF-4 will be limited to its library, which is still needed by other components not yet ported to libdnf5. fedora-eln/eln#201 rpm-software-management/dnf#2161 rpm-software-management/dnf5#1886
yselkowitz
added a commit
to yselkowitz/content-resolver-input
that referenced
this issue
Nov 21, 2024
DNF5 will provide a dnf symlink, and DNF-4 will be limited to its library, which is still needed by other components not yet ported to libdnf5. fedora-eln/eln#201 rpm-software-management/dnf#2161 rpm-software-management/dnf5#1886
yselkowitz
added a commit
to minimization/content-resolver-input
that referenced
this issue
Nov 21, 2024
DNF5 will provide a dnf symlink, and DNF-4 will be limited to its library, which is still needed by other components not yet ported to libdnf5. fedora-eln/eln#201 rpm-software-management/dnf#2161 rpm-software-management/dnf5#1886
|
The Fedora-eln-20241121.n.3 compose was successful and contained all these changes. Further work on removing the remnants of dnf-4 will continue in #206. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
What does the ELN SIG need to do?
DNF5 is now the default package manager in Fedora 41, so presumably RHEL 11 will follow suit and therefore so should ELN. In order to do so, the following step must be taken:
%dnf5_obsoletes_dnfneeds to be true for RHEL 11 in both dnf.spec and dnf5.spec simultaneously, meaning switching0%{?rhel} > 11to0%{?rhel} > 10in coordinated releases of both packages in tandem.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: