Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

PyPI downloads badge #391

Open
DaveSkender opened this issue Aug 7, 2024 · 3 comments
Open

PyPI downloads badge #391

DaveSkender opened this issue Aug 7, 2024 · 3 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request on hold

Comments

@DaveSkender
Copy link
Member

DaveSkender commented Aug 7, 2024

the problem

Consider using total downloads badge

instead of

Though, not sure how accurate the total PyPI downloads are from PePy.

@LeeDongGeon1996
Copy link
Member

LeeDongGeon1996 commented Aug 7, 2024

There are some trade-offs. PePy is the only one that offers total download stats. But it gives the download stat including the number from PyPI mirror site, so that the stat becomes bigger than pure PyPI downloads. On the other hand, PyPI Stats gives us the stat from only PyPI. You can see the diff about 200 on monthly stat:

If its purpose is to show total downloads, I don't mind this change. But just wanted to let you know.

@DaveSkender
Copy link
Member Author

I was reading that too. I'm not sure we should do this one yet, so hold off on any changes. I'm just making a note to revisit later, really.

My only issue with the monthly variant is when downloads fluctuate over time it loses the ability to convey actual mid to long-term popularity. Maybe we should stop fixating on that number and just remove these entirely; since they're somewhat redundant to what's shown in the package managers themselves?

@DaveSkender DaveSkender moved this from 💡 Triage to 🧊 Icebox in Stock Indicators for Python Aug 7, 2024
@LeeDongGeon1996
Copy link
Member

LeeDongGeon1996 commented Aug 7, 2024

My only issue with the monthly variant is when downloads fluctuate over time it loses the ability to convey actual mid to long-term popularity. Maybe we should stop fixating on that number and just remove these entirely; since they're somewhat redundant to what's shown in the package managers themselves?

Agree on that this index can not reflect the popularity over and over the time. But users may be able to use this to find out how reliable it is just for a quick check. Given that, total download maybe worthy to be considered.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request on hold
Projects
Status: 🧊 Icebox
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants