Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Unable to get bounding box that tightly encloses the object #190

Open
pransen opened this issue Mar 18, 2018 · 3 comments
Open

Unable to get bounding box that tightly encloses the object #190

pransen opened this issue Mar 18, 2018 · 3 comments

Comments

@pransen
Copy link

pransen commented Mar 18, 2018

Hi, I tried training the full yolo implementation using my own data (I have a good amount of data). Turned out that the bounding box though are decent but they don't tightly enclose the desired object. Any pointers to this will be of great help. My training data has objects at various scales.

@experiencor
Copy link
Owner

@prantiksen4 You may try to increase coord_scale for tighter box predictions.

@pratt-datar
Copy link

should we train it again?

@experiencor
Copy link
Owner

@pratt-datar I make the new repo (YOLOv3). The new loss function has a better way to penalize box size's loss. You may check it out. (https://github.com/experiencor/keras-yolo3)

P/S: it's a work in progress so expect to spot a lot of bugs.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants