Large resolutions from AnalysisEpic and AnalysisEcce hadronic recon. methods

[c-dilks]

Resolutions from AnalysisEcce from hadronic reconstruction methods are often large, and not centered about zero. For example, y in bins of (x,Q2), compared with AnalysisDelphes and AnalysisAthena, reconstructed by the JB method (this is a CI artifact):

In contrast, the electron method seems reasonable:

[rseidl-rcf]

The reason is that the clusters are not added in AnalysisEcce, yet. I will try to add them in the next days.

[c-dilks]

FYI #184 fixes a bug in the Q2 weighting, and resolves some of the strange features we discussed at the previous meeting, for example, the hole in the y distribution.

[c-dilks]

See plots from the corresponding workflow run https://github.com/eic/sidis-eic/actions/runs/3208357494
Scroll down a bit and click on _FULL_RESULTS, a zip file of plots

[c-dilks]

@Gregtom3 AnaysisEpic seems to have this issue too.

[rseidl-rcf]

I finally got around looking at the clusters in AnalysisEcce...only to find that the clusters were not written out in the Evaluator output for that simulation. In my local Evaluator output they are included, but that is not accessible from S3. I will try to get it set up using my local output files, but in order to use the other ones we would need the simulation team to replace them once more.