You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The following question came up in the review of PR #136.
@PatStLouis : Wouldn't just signing the versionId be sufficient since the versionId is a sort of hash of the entry? Meaning if the entry validation passes, a proof over the versionId only would be sufficient?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
By putting it over the entire entry, we have evidence that the witness at least had the entire entry in their possession. It doesn’t really change the storage requirements, and likely adds a negligable amount of time on the verification. Agree that it doesn’t really change the evidence that the resolver gains from the verification.
The following question came up in the review of PR #136.
@PatStLouis : Wouldn't just signing the versionId be sufficient since the versionId is a sort of hash of the entry? Meaning if the entry validation passes, a proof over the versionId only would be sufficient?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: