Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Expose LaTeXML software authors in a standardized format #2486

Open
physikerwelt opened this issue Jan 14, 2025 · 2 comments
Open

Expose LaTeXML software authors in a standardized format #2486

physikerwelt opened this issue Jan 14, 2025 · 2 comments

Comments

@physikerwelt
Copy link
Contributor

I discovered that the read-me specifies a set of authors of this software. However, this information is currently unavailable in a standardized format such as codemeta. Such an entry could look like

{
    "@context": "https://doi.org/10.5063/schema/codemeta-2.0",
    "type": "SoftwareSourceCode",
    "author": [
        {
            "id": "https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2300-0367",
            "type": "Person",
            "familyName": "Miller",
            "givenName": "Bruce"
        },
        {
            "id": "https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7306-8634",
            "type": "Person",
            "familyName": "Ginev",
            "givenName": "Deyan"
        }
    ],
    "dateModified": "2024-02-26",
    "downloadUrl": "https://github.com/brucemiller/LaTeXML/releases/tag/v0.8.8",
    "name": "LaTeXML",
    "version": "0.8.8"
}

and can be placed in a file called codemeta.json and located in the root of the git repository guide.

While this has no benefit to LaTeXML itself, it would help services like swMATH to get the software metadata correctly.

@dginev
Copy link
Collaborator

dginev commented Jan 14, 2025

Hi Moritz,

Are you familiar with github's CITATION files? How do they compare/tie in to such an enhancement?

https://docs.github.com/en/repositories/managing-your-repositorys-settings-and-features/customizing-your-repository/about-citation-files

@physikerwelt
Copy link
Contributor Author

This is also fine. There should be a so called crosswalk from CFF to codemeta.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants