You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Following our conversation a couple of weeks ago, I just take time now to provide a comparison (with example) between BIEN4 and GBIF data, of course using the two relevant R packages. I'll take the sycamore maple (Acer pseudoplatanus) for the illustration, although it's probably irrelevant. Here we go:
BIEN4 occurrence data
Note: This comes from my own records from a few days ago, as BIEN servers seem unresponsive as of today (The BIEN servers are currently undergoing updates and may be slower than usual at present.).
There is a striking difference between the two datasets, even after removing a bunch of data with non-commercial restrictions (728 vs. 387557 records).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hey @bmaitner!
Following our conversation a couple of weeks ago, I just take time now to provide a comparison (with example) between BIEN4 and GBIF data, of course using the two relevant R packages. I'll take the sycamore maple (Acer pseudoplatanus) for the illustration, although it's probably irrelevant. Here we go:
BIEN4 occurrence data
Note: This comes from my own records from a few days ago, as BIEN servers seem unresponsive as of today (
The BIEN servers are currently undergoing updates and may be slower than usual at present.
).Information about
BIEN
:Get the data:
Only data after 1990:
Convert to
sf
class for mapping:GBIF occurrence data and comparison
Prepare the query and download the data:
Remove non-commercial data and check the resulting data:
Convert to
sf
class for mapping:Summary
There is a striking difference between the two datasets, even after removing a bunch of data with non-commercial restrictions (728 vs. 387557 records).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: