You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This is the feedback from the workshop with 10 diy jade installations from the weekend. All in all it worked pretty well. One participant had problems with installing the dependencies, as the script told him only one dependency to install per run so he had to run the script a lot of times to iterate over all. So improvements would be:
Add an apt command in the readme in the automated sections to install all dependencies at once
If the script detects that one dependency is missing, show the missing dependency together will an install command for all others or even better, test for all missing at once and show only these
Provide an even more noob friendly option for installation: I thought about a python app image which is reproducible build on github ci that contains python and esp-idf, jade, the scripts and all dependencies so that this works independently from the linux distribution / packages installed with just one command execution. With this one large binary file it should be even possible to do offline jade installations
What do you think about it?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Agreed, this is a painpoint. And that offline flashing would be nice.
I like all three of those bullet points.
Yes, adding a command to the readme makes sense.
Checking for all of the missing dependencies and giving the user a tailored install command would he sweet.
This one is tricky, since so far we've avoided delivering any binaries. My biggest concern is that it would increase trust placed in GitHub. How do you minimize trust in this setup? Can the user build the same binary locally and get the same sha? Would the GitHub Actions build have the same sha every time it ran, and update only when we change the underlying code?
Thanks for your feedback. To bullet point 3 (delivering binaries):
Yes, if we really starting doing this the binaries need to be byte for byte reproducible, on github ci and local. The electrum guys are basically doing the same with their binaries and also let them sign by known 3rd parties (@Emzy and others) after they can build the exact same binary local.
Maybe we can accomplish the same. I will play around with it
This is the feedback from the workshop with 10 diy jade installations from the weekend. All in all it worked pretty well. One participant had problems with installing the dependencies, as the script told him only one dependency to install per run so he had to run the script a lot of times to iterate over all. So improvements would be:
What do you think about it?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: