Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

is it necessary for setting this parameter "secondary_check_script" in the one and same LAN ? #92

Open
GoogleCodeExporter opened this issue Jul 30, 2015 · 2 comments

Comments

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link
Contributor

In general, it is highly recommended to have two or more network routes to 
check MySQL master server availability.
secondary_check_script = masterha_secondary_check -s remote_host1 -s 
remote_host2

My question as follows:
If all my machine(mysql master,mysql slave ,MHA manager) are in the one and the 
same LAN , is it necessary for setting this parameter?

I think it is not necessary.
I have to make sure that remote_host1 and remote_host2 are alive ,if one is 
dead,at the same time the master node is dead ,MHA failover will not be 
successful because mha manager can not login the remote_host .

What is your opinion about it?

Original issue reported on code.google.com by [email protected] on 1 Aug 2014 at 3:07

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant