Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Convert common objects to real objects/types? #39

Open
drkameleon opened this issue Nov 4, 2023 · 0 comments
Open

Convert common objects to real objects/types? #39

drkameleon opened this issue Nov 4, 2023 · 0 comments
Assignees
Labels
cleanup Code cleanup engine Issues related the Grafito database engine enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@drkameleon
Copy link
Contributor

Given that we are handling different types of data repeatedly, through Dictionary values, I think it would make perfect sense to define them as proper types and then create objects (of the aforementioned types) accordingly.

It will make the code quite cleaner + they can be used as part of differentiating what-is-what (instead of relying too much on our core types, which is more than often since this is what we do e.g. for node/edge filters)

@drkameleon drkameleon added enhancement New feature or request engine Issues related the Grafito database engine cleanup Code cleanup labels Nov 4, 2023
@drkameleon drkameleon self-assigned this Nov 4, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
cleanup Code cleanup engine Issues related the Grafito database engine enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant