You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
first and foremost many thanks for your very useful package which I'm using to map the horizontal distribution of categories of archaeological finds on a sites we excavated using a grid system. As the individual quantities have sort of a high variance I get quite bit differences between the biggest and smallest pies.
A very short reproducible example of what I'm doing:
At the moment I'm using the logarithms of the SUM column (r = log(SUM)/50) in order to 'equalize' those differences a bit. But this approach isn't thus robust. I haven't found any solution that matches e.g. scale_size_continuous(range = c(2, 4)), which I'm using to control the min and max of point sizes (I use geom_point for mapping distributions of a specific category of finds).
Best and many thanks for any help,
Dirk
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi,
first and foremost many thanks for your very useful package which I'm using to map the horizontal distribution of categories of archaeological finds on a sites we excavated using a grid system. As the individual quantities have sort of a high variance I get quite bit differences between the biggest and smallest pies.
A very short reproducible example of what I'm doing:
Should give results like: or
At the moment I'm using the logarithms of the
SUM
column (r = log(SUM)/50
) in order to 'equalize' those differences a bit. But this approach isn't thus robust. I haven't found any solution that matches e.g.scale_size_continuous(range = c(2, 4))
, which I'm using to control the min and max of point sizes (I usegeom_point
for mapping distributions of a specific category of finds).Best and many thanks for any help,
Dirk
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: