You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi @YingyiLiu , as a continuation issue #26 , I see that when the RAOs are calculated for the 6DOF system using the added mass, radiation damping and excitation for in HAMS, they are quite different from WAMIT. I think this is because in the added mass and radiation damping as obtained from HAMS are the same as WAMIT (considering the dimensionalization of course), however for the excitation force, a+ib = -d-ic, where a+ib is the excitation for in WAMIT and c+id is the excitation force in HAMS. Would you know where this is coming from?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi @YingyiLiu , as a continuation issue #26 , I see that when the RAOs are calculated for the 6DOF system using the added mass, radiation damping and excitation for in HAMS, they are quite different from WAMIT. I think this is because in the added mass and radiation damping as obtained from HAMS are the same as WAMIT (considering the dimensionalization of course), however for the excitation force, a+ib = -d-ic, where a+ib is the excitation for in WAMIT and c+id is the excitation force in HAMS. Would you know where this is coming from?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: