Selling it as a git subcommand?

[StreakyCobra]

It could be interesting to sell it as a git subcommand to clarify its relation to git.

[emlun]

It would be trivial to distribute a symlink /usr/bin/git-workspace => gws which would make it invokable as git workspace, or the like. We could add this to the README as a suggestion to packagers. :)

The question then is whether we should "rebrand" it as a git subcommand first and foremost, and a standalone utility second, or keep it the other way around. I like both options, but I think it would be hard to rebrand it without changing the name. But perhaps we could pitch it as

gws, git-workspace - Colorful KISS helper for git workspaces

and have it both ways. :)