Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

NetBSD curses and BSD bmake? #6

Open
mamccollum opened this issue Jul 28, 2024 · 2 comments
Open

NetBSD curses and BSD bmake? #6

mamccollum opened this issue Jul 28, 2024 · 2 comments

Comments

@mamccollum
Copy link

mamccollum commented Jul 28, 2024

As potentially default alternatives to the ubiquitous ncurses, there is NetBSD curses (which has been ported to both musl libc and glibc).

There is also bmake as an alternative to GNU make, which is used with NetBSD's pkgsrc and works on nearly every Unix system (*BSD, Linux with multiple libcs, Illumos, etc). It uses autotools to ensure its portability when building it.

I feel that, since Copacabana is aiming for using smaller and alternative software projects, this could be a good option as the default make and libcurses (while still retaining the GNU equivalents for compatibility).

@takusuman
Copy link
Member

I think NetBSD curses can be used, but isn't bmake incompatible with GNU make-style Makefiles? Maybe this would make impossible to compile even the Linux kernel.

@takusuman
Copy link
Member

I thought about using OpenPAM, but modules would be needed to be ported.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants