We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
If I followed the breadcrumbs here right, the displayed max GC time comes from the maximum as computed here:
BenchmarkTools.jl/src/trials.jl
Lines 116 to 119 in 7eebf01
Which isn't really the maximum GC time. Since it's displayed independently, this can be surprising.
Cf. https://discourse.julialang.org/t/time-and-benchmark-give-different-results/66374/3
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
In BenchmarkTools GC time is always printed as a ratio. That's why we do gcratio(maximum(trial)).
gcratio(maximum(trial))
So yes the fact that we say the "maximum GC" is 0.0% is confusing
0.0%
See discussion in #250 as well.
Sorry, something went wrong.
@benchmark
No branches or pull requests
If I followed the breadcrumbs here right, the displayed max GC time comes from the maximum as computed here:
BenchmarkTools.jl/src/trials.jl
Lines 116 to 119 in 7eebf01
Which isn't really the maximum GC time. Since it's displayed independently, this can be surprising.
Cf. https://discourse.julialang.org/t/time-and-benchmark-give-different-results/66374/3
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: