Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Performance vs. AstroSCRAPPY #7

Open
mileslucas opened this issue Nov 25, 2021 · 0 comments
Open

Performance vs. AstroSCRAPPY #7

mileslucas opened this issue Nov 25, 2021 · 0 comments

Comments

@mileslucas
Copy link
Member

This code is slightly slower than Astro-SCRAPPY, and I've done some microbenchmarks to investigate. The majority of the time difference appears to be during the median filtering. I suspect the completely hand-written medians in AstroSCRAPPY's C source are the reason why.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@mileslucas