Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

why would one use rerddap #156

Closed
maelle opened this issue Feb 28, 2024 · 2 comments
Closed

why would one use rerddap #156

maelle opened this issue Feb 28, 2024 · 2 comments
Labels
documentation Improvements or additions to documentation

Comments

@maelle
Copy link
Collaborator

maelle commented Feb 28, 2024

@salvafern this is a question to help me improve the README. why would one use rerddap instead of the EMODnetWCS or EMODnetWFS, what's the difference?

@maelle maelle added the documentation Improvements or additions to documentation label Feb 28, 2024
@salvafern
Copy link
Collaborator

My 2 cents about this: EMODnet data are currently scattered between several geoserver and erddap instances, as the main goal is that it can be published in the emodnet geoviewer and sometimes geoserver offers better capabilities than erddap and viceversa.

Neither EMODnetWCS/WFS or rerddap alone will be comprehensive, but they offer scripting access to the bits of data hold in each system. At some point in the future this will be better organized, but for the time being EMODnetWCS/WFS and rerddap complement each other in gathering EMODnet data.

@maelle
Copy link
Collaborator Author

maelle commented Feb 28, 2024

Thanks so much, this clarifies things!

@maelle maelle closed this as completed in db36e14 Feb 28, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
documentation Improvements or additions to documentation
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants