Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Consider GitHub Actions #143

Open
Ailrun opened this issue Dec 8, 2019 · 7 comments
Open

Consider GitHub Actions #143

Ailrun opened this issue Dec 8, 2019 · 7 comments
Assignees
Labels
discussion This issue or pull request is under a discussion refactoring This issue or pull request suggests a way to refactor codes

Comments

@Ailrun
Copy link
Member

Ailrun commented Dec 8, 2019

GitHub Actions is free for open source projects, and it supports parallelism too,
whereas CircleCI's free plan is quite limited.

(However, CircleCI's first-class docker support has its advantage.)

@Ailrun Ailrun added refactoring This issue or pull request suggests a way to refactor codes discussion This issue or pull request is under a discussion labels Dec 8, 2019
@Ailrun Ailrun self-assigned this Dec 8, 2019
@Ailrun
Copy link
Member Author

Ailrun commented Dec 10, 2019

I failed to replace CircleCI because of cache size limit.
GitHub Actions has strict <=400MB cache limit, which is almost impossible to satisfy with our dep size (it requires nearly 450MB).

@Ailrun Ailrun closed this as completed Dec 10, 2019
@Ailrun
Copy link
Member Author

Ailrun commented Dec 10, 2019

Ref: actions/cache#6

@smorimoto
Copy link

The cache limit has been bumped to 2GB.

@Ailrun
Copy link
Member Author

Ailrun commented Jan 9, 2020

@imbsky yes, I subscribed the issue, so I know it is increased. Now I am considering it again.

@smorimoto
Copy link

If 450 MB is enough, there is no problem, but if 1GB is needed, the cache can't be used effectively, so there are still many concerns.

@Ailrun
Copy link
Member Author

Ailrun commented Jan 9, 2020

@imbsky Yes, even with 450MB, it cannot save more than 4 snapshots, and that's why I am reluctant now.

@Ailrun
Copy link
Member Author

Ailrun commented May 11, 2020

Now it's 5GB, so I'm planning to introduce it again.

@Ailrun Ailrun reopened this May 11, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
discussion This issue or pull request is under a discussion refactoring This issue or pull request suggests a way to refactor codes
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants